Written by Dano Estermann, Co-Founder of Stellmann Non-Slip Coatings
CSIRO-certified slip resistance specialists serving commercial facilities, aged care operators, and facility managers across Australia since 2019.
Want my team to help you with slip resistance, click here.
Vinyl flooring has long been a popular choice in aged care facilities due to its durability, affordability, and ease of cleaning. However, as vinyl floors age, surface wear and coating degradation can significantly reduce slip resistance, increasing the risk of slips and falls among older residents.
With growing scrutiny of slip resistance compliance, it is important to reassess whether existing floors remain fit for purpose. This article explores the lifespan of vinyl flooring, safety risks, and why non-slip coatings are an effective alternative to full replacement.
Vinyl flooring typically has a lifespan of 10 to 20 years, depending on the quality of the material, installation standards, and the level of foot traffic it experiences. In aged care facilities, this lifespan can range from 3 to 5 years due to continuous use, regular cleaning, and exposure to moisture.
Over time, vinyl floors experience:
Vinyl flooring may no longer meet safety standards for slip resistance, even if it appears to be in good condition. This makes regular assessment essential, particularly in high-risk areas such as bathrooms, dining rooms, corridors, and entryways.
Facility managers should note that visual inspection alone is not a reliable indicator of floor safety. Slip resistance should be measured using recognised testing methods as outlined in AS 4586 and AS 4663.
Vinyl flooring gets smoother and more dangerous as it ages, especially when it's wet. For elderly residents, this change significantly increases the risk of slips and falls.
Age-related factors that amplify this risk include:
When slip resistance falls below acceptable levels, even routine activities like walking to the bathroom or dining area can result in serious injury.
According to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), falls are one of the leading causes of hospitalisation in older Australians, and aged care facilities are under increasing pressure to demonstrate proactive risk management.
Interestingly, cleaning worn vinyl is also challenging. Cleaning agent residue may further reduce friction, resulting in a vicious cycle where more cleaning actually increases slip risk rather than reduces it.
Further Reading: How to Make Bathrooms Safe for Elderly Parents
The safest flooring for elderly residents is not defined solely by material. True safety depends on slip resistance compliance, particularly in wet and high-traffic areas.
Key characteristics of safe flooring for aged care facilities include:
Slip resistance is measured using the Pendulum Test, which assigns a P-rating from P0 to P5. In aged care facilities, many areas such as bathrooms, ramps, and entry points require a P4 or P5 rating to meet safety and compliance standards.

With these requirements in mind, some flooring materials have proven to be both safe and practical for elderly bathrooms. These include rubber flooring, non-slip bathroom tiles, and non-slip vinyl tiles.
All three materials are also durable enough to withstand frequent cleaning and exposure to moisture.
Overall, choosing the right flooring improves safety, comfort, and independence for elderly users. However, even flooring that was originally compliant can become unsafe over time. Hence, ongoing slip resistance testing and proactive maintenance are essential for aged care operators to meet their duty of care obligations.
Replacing vinyl flooring in an aged care facility is disruptive, expensive, and time-consuming. Full replacement typically involves:
In large facilities, flooring replacement projects can quickly escalate into six-figure expenses and often disrupt daily operations and resident routines.

Non-slip coatings offer a cost-effective alternative that restores slip resistance without replacing the existing vinyl floor. These treatments are applied directly to the surface and are designed to improve traction while preserving the original appearance.
Key benefits include:
For facility managers, this makes non-slip coatings an attractive option for extending the life of existing vinyl floors while addressing safety concerns.
A key advantage of non-slip coatings is how they help facilities maintain ongoing slip-resistance compliance. When professionally applied, premium coatings can restore existing floors to slip ratings compliant with Australian Standards.
To verify performance in real-world conditions, Stellmann's non-slip treatments are independently tested in accordance with AS 4663. This testing provides documented evidence of compliance, which is critical during audits, incident investigations, and regulatory reviews.
Further Reading: The Complete Guide to Slip Resistance Compliance for Commercial Facilities
Answer:
Yes, vinyl flooring for aged care facilities is safe, provided it continues to meet slip-resistance requirements. Wear, polishing, and frequent cleaning can reduce traction over time, so regular assessment and slip testing are essential.
Answer:
Not always. If the vinyl flooring and subfloor remain structurally sound, a certified non-slip coating can restore traction, improving safety. Coatings are also more cost-effective and less disruptive than full replacement.
Answer:
Facilities can maintain compliance by using certified non-slip coatings, conducting regular slip testing, and keeping clear documentation to support audits and incident reviews.
Vinyl flooring for aged care facilities is a safe and practical option, but only when slip resistance is actively maintained. As vinyl surfaces wear out, traction reduces, increasing the risk of slips and falls — particularly for vulnerable, elderly residents.
Rather than relying on appearance alone, facility managers should prioritise slip-resistance testing and compliance in line with Australian Standards. In most cases, you can restore the slip resistance of vinyl floors with premium non-slip coatings.
The Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (ACQSC) is the independent national regulator responsible for monitoring, assessing, and enforcing compliance with the Aged Care Quality Standards. For facility managers and Directors of Nursing, understanding how these standards intersect with flooring safety is not optional — it is a direct compliance obligation that is assessed during every accreditation audit.
Standard 3: Personal Care and Clinical Care requires aged care providers to take all reasonable steps to prevent and minimise harm to residents. Falls prevention is specifically identified as a risk management priority. Inspectors examine whether the physical environment — including floor surfaces — contributes to or mitigates fall risk for residents. A floor that fails an AS4663 pendulum test is direct evidence that the organisation has not met its duty of care under this standard.
During an announced or unannounced audit, ACQSC inspectors will assess your facility against the Aged Care Quality Standards. In relation to flooring, they typically look for:
Gaps in any of these areas can result in a requirement for improvement, which must be addressed within a specified timeframe. Repeated or serious non-compliance can escalate to sanctions, increased monitoring, or — in severe cases — revocation of provider approval.
Under AS4586:2013, slip resistance ratings are area-specific. In aged care, the following minimum ratings apply:
It is important to note that the NCC (National Construction Code) and AS4586 set minimum thresholds — ACQSC and insurers may expect higher standards where the resident population presents elevated fall risk. See our full guide: P3 vs P4 slip rating for aged care.
Maintaining a compliant floor is necessary, but so is proving it. Your ACQSC compliance file for flooring should include:
Without this documentation, even a genuinely compliant floor cannot be demonstrated to an inspector. Documentation is the audit trail — and in aged care, the audit trail is everything.
Vinyl flooring does not fail overnight. Non-compliance is typically a gradual process, and by the time a floor looks worn, its slip resistance may have been below the required threshold for months or even years. For facility managers, understanding the degradation pathway is the first step in getting ahead of it.
Most commercial vinyl products leave the factory with a polyurethane or UV-cured surface coating that provides an initial slip resistance rating. In standard commercial environments, this coating may last 5 to 10 years. In aged care, where floors are cleaned multiple times daily with hospital-grade disinfectants, that lifespan drops to approximately 3 to 5 years — and in busy bathroom or shower areas, potentially less.
Hospital-grade disinfectants — including quaternary ammonium compounds, bleach-based solutions, and enzymatic cleaners — are essential for infection control in aged care. However, repeated application of these products gradually strips the micro-texture of vinyl surfaces, reducing the coefficient of friction that provides grip underfoot. This is a well-documented interaction in the flooring and infection control literature, and it creates a difficult tension for facility managers: the very products required for hygiene compliance can accelerate slip-resistance non-compliance.
Wear is not uniform across a facility. Specific zones accumulate damage faster:
A floor can look clean, unmarked, and in good condition while measuring below P3 on an AS4663 pendulum test. Visual inspection identifies surface damage — scuffs, scratches, discolouration — but it cannot measure the micro-texture that determines friction. An aged care facility relying solely on visual walkthroughs to assess floor safety is operating without an adequate risk management framework. AS4663 pendulum testing, conducted by an accredited technician, is the only method that produces a defensible, documented slip resistance measurement.
Certain events should trigger an immediate floor safety review regardless of your scheduled testing interval:
When a floor test confirms non-compliance, facility managers face a choice between several remediation pathways. Each has a different cost profile, operational impact, compliance outcome, and service life. Understanding these trade-offs clearly allows you to make the right call for your facility — and document that decision for your ACQSC file.
| Option | Approx. Cost | Disruption | Compliance Outcome | Lifespan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full vinyl replacement | $80–$120/m² | Major — 2–5 day area closure, potential resident relocation | New factory coating; compliant at installation | 3–5 years in aged care before re-assessment needed |
| Non-slip chemical coating | $25–$35/m² | Minimal — same-day reopening | AS4586 P4 certified; certificate issued post-treatment | 3–7 years with appropriate maintenance |
| Mechanical grinding / abrasion | $40–$55/m² | Moderate — dust management, 1–2 day cure | Permanent texture improvement; AS4663 testable | Permanent (structural change to surface) |
| Anti-slip overlay tape | $5–$15/m² | None | Not AS4586 certified — hygiene risk; edges lift under cleaning | 6–18 months; not suitable for aged care environments |
For most aged care operators, non-slip chemical coating represents the optimal balance: it achieves P4 compliance, requires no area closure beyond a few hours, and costs a fraction of full replacement. Stellmann's CSIRO-certified coatings achieve P4 compliance in aged care environments, with a post-treatment certificate suitable for your ACQSC compliance file. See our full explanation of rating standards: AS4586 slip resistance compliance guide.
Anti-slip tape is not recommended for aged care facilities. While inexpensive, tape edges create trip hazards as they lift under mopping, and the product cannot be tested to AS4586 — meaning it provides no defensible compliance outcome.
Remediating floor slip resistance in a live aged care facility requires careful planning. Residents cannot simply be moved off a floor for two days. Scheduling, communication, and documentation must all be managed in parallel with the treatment itself.
Begin with the areas that carry the highest fall risk and the heaviest ACQSC scrutiny: bathrooms, ensuites, wet rooms, and shower recesses. These spaces combine water, soap residue, and mobility-impaired residents — the highest-risk combination in any aged care facility. Once wet areas are treated and certified, move to corridors, dining rooms, and entry areas in order of assessed risk.
Non-slip chemical coatings are well-suited to a staggered application schedule. A skilled applicator can treat a single bathroom ensuite in 60 to 90 minutes, with a curing period of 2 to 4 hours before re-use. This allows treatment to be scheduled during:
For corridor treatments, temporary barriers and clear signage are sufficient. There is no need to relocate residents or close wards.
Notify all nursing, care, and cleaning staff before treatment begins. Key messages:
A compliant non-slip treatment programme should always conclude with an AS4663 pendulum test conducted by an independent accredited technician. The resulting certificate, showing the achieved P-rating by area, becomes the primary document in your ACQSC flooring compliance file. Ensure the certificate records the date, location, product applied, and the specific P-rating achieved — all details an ACQSC inspector will verify.
Non-slip coatings are not a set-and-forget solution. To protect both the treatment and your compliance position, establish:
At minimum, aged care facilities should conduct AS4663 pendulum testing annually for all wet areas (bathrooms, ensuites, wet rooms) and high-risk transition zones such as ramp thresholds and corridor-to-bathroom entries. Lower-risk dry areas — dining rooms, lounges, dry corridors — can be tested on a biennial cycle provided no incidents have occurred and no significant changes to cleaning products or floor surface have taken place. Beyond scheduled testing, a mandatory re-test should be triggered immediately following any resident fall incident where floor slip resistance is a plausible contributing factor. ACQSC inspectors expect to see a documented testing schedule, and the absence of one — even without an incident — can constitute a finding under the Aged Care Quality Standards. Annual testing is the most defensible position and the industry norm among well-managed facilities.
Under AS4586:2013, wet areas in aged care facilities require a minimum P3 rating when tested with the AS4663 pendulum method. However, P3 represents the regulatory floor, not the recommended standard. Given the vulnerability of aged care residents — many of whom have impaired balance, use mobility aids, and may have cognitive conditions affecting hazard awareness — P4 is widely recommended by risk managers, insurers, and facility operators for bathroom floors, shower recesses, and any area subject to regular water exposure. Some facilities and their insurers now specify P4 as the contractual minimum for all wet areas, regardless of the regulatory threshold. Where there is any doubt, defaulting to P4 is the more defensible and safer position. See our detailed breakdown: P3 vs P4 slip rating for aged care.
Yes — and in most cases, this is the preferred approach. High-performance non-slip chemical coatings are specifically formulated to penetrate and bond with vinyl, rubber, and composite floor surfaces. The treatment works at the micro-texture level, increasing the coefficient of friction without altering the visible surface appearance or adding any raised profile that could create a trip hazard. The existing vinyl does not need to be removed, and in most aged care bathrooms and corridors, the treatment can be applied and cured within a single day. The key requirement is that the vinyl substrate must be structurally sound — no delamination, bubbling, or subsurface water damage. If the vinyl is structurally compromised, replacement is the correct first step before any coating is applied. For structurally sound floors, however, coating over replacement is almost always faster, cheaper, and equally compliant.
ACQSC does not prescribe a specific list of flooring documents, but the Aged Care Quality Standards require evidence of a systematic approach to risk management — and floor safety falls squarely within that obligation. In practice, a well-prepared ACQSC compliance file for flooring includes: AS4663 pendulum test certificates for all tested areas (dated, area-specific, and showing the achieved P-rating); a floor safety risk assessment reviewed at least annually; maintenance logs recording inspection dates, any issues found, and corrective actions taken; post-treatment certificates where non-slip coatings or mechanical treatments have been applied; and records of any fall incidents that involved floor surfaces, together with the subsequent corrective action. When an ACQSC inspector asks about floor safety, your response should be a folder of documents — not a verbal assurance. Facilities that cannot produce current test certificates are immediately at risk of a compliance finding.
In the vast majority of applications, high-quality non-slip chemical coatings produce no visible or tactile change to the floor surface. The treatment penetrates the micro-structure of the vinyl and enhances friction at a level below what the eye can detect or what residents and staff will notice underfoot. There is no added texture, grit, or film that residents might find uncomfortable or that nursing staff walking the floor in soft-soled footwear would notice. Coatings do not alter the floor colour, sheen level, or surface profile. The one exception is where a facility manager specifically requests a higher-texture treatment for an extreme high-risk area — in those cases, a slight tactile difference may be perceptible, but this is atypical for standard vinyl applications. For most aged care vinyl floors, the before-and-after appearance is identical to the naked eye, while the AS4663 test result tells an entirely different story.
Treatment time varies by area size and surface type, but as a general guide: a single bathroom ensuite takes approximately 60 to 90 minutes for application, followed by a 2 to 4 hour curing period before the area can be safely re-entered. A standard corridor section of 20 to 30 metres can typically be treated in a half-day, with one side kept accessible at all times to avoid resident disruption. Dining rooms and larger communal areas may require a full day depending on floor area. For a complete wing of a mid-sized aged care facility (bathrooms, corridors, and common areas), a professional team can typically complete the treatment programme over 2 to 3 days without requiring any area to be closed for more than half a day at a time. This compares favourably with full vinyl replacement, which typically requires a 3 to 5 day hard closure per section and may necessitate temporary resident relocation.
We reply within 24 hours.
Do you need immediate assistance?
Give us a call at 1300 987 095
!