Written by Dano Estermann, Co-Founder of Stellmann Non-Slip Coatings
CSIRO-certified slip resistance specialists serving commercial facilities, aged care operators, and facility managers across Australia since 2019.
Want my team to help you with slip resistance, click here.
As a facility manager, your WHS obligations don't end at putting up a "wet floor" sign. Under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011, section 19, your primary duty of care requires you to eliminate or minimise risks to health and safety — so far as is reasonably practicable. For floors, that means knowing their slip resistance classification, not guessing it.
A one-off test at construction completion tells you what the surface achieved on day one. A systematic audit tells you what it achieves today — after cleaning chemicals, foot traffic, resurfacing, and time have done their work. The difference matters. A floor that passed AS4586 testing three years ago may now be borderline. In a wet zone, borderline is a liability.
This checklist gives you a zone-by-zone audit framework you can use today, with the exact P-rating requirements, correct test standards, recommended frequencies, and pass/fail indicators for every area of your facility.
A slip resistance audit is not the same as a single slip test. Understanding the scope is the first step to running one properly.
A full audit covers:
These are two different standards for two different contexts:
If you're auditing an existing facility, you are always operating under AS4663. AS4586 is the standard that tiles or coatings were certified to before installation — it tells you what they should achieve. AS4663 is the standard that tells you what they achieve now.
A slip test is a single measurement at a specific point. A full audit uses multiple tests across a zone, cross-references against required P-ratings for that space type, documents maintenance and cleaning protocols, identifies degradation factors, and produces actionable remediation priorities. A slip test is one input into an audit — not a substitute for it.
Required P-rating: P4 minimum (equivalent to 55+ BPN in wet pendulum test)
Test standard: AS4663:2013 — wet pendulum on-site test
Recommended frequency: Annual minimum; post any surface treatment or renovation
Auditor notes: Cleaning products are a significant degradation factor in amenities. Alkaline cleaners strip surface texture from unglazed tiles over time. Review your cleaning specification as part of the audit — not just the floor condition.
Required P-rating: P5 minimum (≥ 64 BPN under wet pendulum with oil contamination)
Test standard: AS4663:2013 — wet pendulum test, ideally with an oil/grease contamination simulation
Recommended frequency: Every 6 months in high-use kitchens; immediately following any deep clean involving degreaser chemicals
Auditor notes: P5 is mandatory for commercial kitchens under the model WHS framework. Oil and fat contamination is the primary degradation factor — not wear. A kitchen floor that tests P5 dry may test P3 under oil contamination. Your audit must test under contaminated conditions to reflect real operating risk. See commercial kitchen slip compliance for kitchen-specific requirements.
Required P-rating: P3 minimum (dry); P4 where weather-exposed or where rain ingress occurs
Test standard: AS4663:2013 — wet pendulum where rain exposure is present; visual and dry pendulum where fully covered
Recommended frequency: Annual; additional inspection after heavy rain events or seasonal changes
Auditor notes: Entry areas are disproportionately high-risk during rain events. A P3 rating on a dry-rated entry tile becomes non-compliant the moment rain tracking occurs. Your audit must include wet-condition testing for any entry zone that is weather-exposed or has less than a full weather protection overhang.
Required P-rating: P3 minimum for dry corridors; P4 where regular wet contamination is possible
Test standard: AS4663:2013 — visual inspection supplemented by pendulum testing at wear points
Recommended frequency: Visual inspection quarterly; pendulum test every 2 years minimum, or following resurfacing
Auditor notes: Abrasive wear is the primary degradation factor in corridors. High-heeled foot traffic, trolley traffic, and cleaning machines all contribute to surface polishing over time. Focus visual inspection on the centre of primary walkways — this is where wear concentrates and where test results diverge from less-trafficked zones.
Required P-rating: P3 minimum (NCC requirement); P4 recommended for wet or outdoor stairways
Test standard: AS4663:2013 for surface slip resistance; AS1428.1 for nosing visibility compliance
Recommended frequency: Annual; immediate inspection following any trip or fall incident
Auditor notes: Staircase compliance has two distinct elements: slip resistance (AS4663) and visual contrast (AS1428.1). Both are separately measurable and both are separately enforceable. A stair tread that passes the pendulum test may still fail if the nosing contrast is inadequate. Test both. For ramps, gradient must comply with NCC D2.14 (1:14 maximum gradient) and the surface must achieve P4 minimum.
Required classification: R10 minimum for pedestrian areas; R11 for ramps (ramp test method, not pendulum)
Test standard: AS4663:2013 ramp angle test for R-rating determination; AS4586 for specification reference
Recommended frequency: Annual; post-sealing or resurfacing; after oil spill events
Auditor notes: Car parks use R-ratings, not P-ratings. R-ratings are determined by a ramp angle test, not the wet pendulum. Do not apply P-rating results to car park surfaces — the methods are not interchangeable. R10 is the minimum for pedestrian-accessible areas; ramps used by pedestrians require R11.
| P-Rating | BPN (Wet Pendulum) | Typical Commercial Application |
|---|---|---|
| P0 | < 12 | Unsafe — no compliant use case |
| P1 | 12–24 | Dry pedestrian only — purely aesthetic surfaces |
| P2 | 25–34 | Low-risk dry indoor areas only |
| P3 | 35–44 | General interior dry areas, corridors, lobbies |
| P4 | 45–54 | Wet areas, amenities, entries with weather exposure |
| P5 | ≥ 55 | High-contamination environments — commercial kitchens, food processing |
For aged care and healthcare facilities, AS4586 guidance recommends P4 as a minimum in all areas, including dry corridors, due to the elevated fall risk of the population. See P4 vs P5 rating guide for a full breakdown of rating requirements by facility type.
A valid compliance certificate from a NATA-accredited laboratory or certified tester must include:
A certificate without individual test point results is inadequate. You need the raw data, not just the summary classification.
A P4 classification requires ≥ 45 BPN. A result of 46 BPN is technically a pass. A result of 53 BPN is a comfortable pass with margin. In a wet zone, a marginal pass requires more frequent retesting (every 6 months rather than annually), documentation of the marginal result as a monitored risk, and a surface treatment plan in the event the next test returns a fail. Marginal passes are not failures — but treating them as clean passes is a liability risk. Document them explicitly.
Every facility manager must maintain:
Under the model WHS Regulations, WHS records must be retained for a minimum of 5 years from the date of the record. For incidents that result in injury, the period extends to the duration of any related claim or litigation plus 5 years. Store these records in a format that cannot be accidentally deleted or overwritten.
Section 38 of the WHS Act requires immediate notification to the relevant regulator (SafeWork NSW, WorkSafe Victoria, etc.) for any notifiable incident. For floors, this applies when a slip results in serious injury (fracture, hospitalisation, amputation) or death. Notification must be made immediately by fastest means, followed by written notification within 48 hours. The site must be preserved for inspection unless doing so creates further risk.
SafeWork NSW enforcement actions on slip/fall incidents consistently distinguish between facilities with documented audit histories and those without. A facility that can produce a current compliance certificate tested within 12 months, a risk assessment identifying the zone as high-risk, a maintenance log demonstrating regular inspection, and an incident response record showing immediate corrective action is in a fundamentally different legal position to one that cannot. The documented trail demonstrates that risks were identified, assessed, and controlled — meeting the "so far as is reasonably practicable" test under s.19.
Self-assessment (visual inspection, no instrumented testing) is appropriate for routine condition monitoring between professional tests, post-cleaning checks for obvious contamination or surface change, and documenting observations in the maintenance log. Self-assessment must be documented. Record the date, inspector, zones checked, and any observations. A visual inspection that goes undocumented provides no legal protection.
Mandatory professional testing:
Strongly recommended:
When a zone fails an AS4663 test, you have three practical options. Choose based on the surface type, operational constraints, and budget.
Cost: $20–$40/m²
Disruption: 24–48 hours (application + cure time)
Process: A chemical compound is applied to the existing tile surface, creating a micro-etched profile that increases surface texture without changing appearance. No tile removal required.
Recertification: New AS4663 test conducted after full cure. Certificate typically issued within 24–48 hours of treatment.
Suitable for: Ceramic tile, porcelain tile, natural stone — most wet area surfaces
Stellmann Non-Slip coatings are CSIRO-certified to AS4586 P4/P5 compliance, making them a documented compliant solution for facilities requiring certified remediation with minimal operational downtime.
Cost: $40–$60/m²
Disruption: 1–3 days depending on area size; potential for dust and noise
Process: Surface texture is mechanically restored by removing the top layer of the tile or concrete. Permanent solution — the texture is part of the substrate, not a coating.
Recertification: Full AS4663 retest required before the area returns to service.
Suitable for: Concrete floors, heavily worn tiles, car parks
Cost: $100–$200/m²+ depending on tile specification and subfloor condition
Disruption: 3–10 days minimum per zone
Process: Tile removal, subfloor preparation, re-tiling with AS4586-certified slip-resistant tiles, grouting, and curing.
When required: Where the substrate is irreparably damaged, where the tile specification is fundamentally wrong for the zone (e.g., polished marble in a wet area), or where mechanical grinding would compromise tile integrity.
For a deeper look at this topic, see our complete guide: Warehouse Floor Anti-slip Compliance AU WHS Requirements.
The minimum recommended frequency depends on zone type. Wet areas (bathrooms, change rooms, amenities) should be tested annually at minimum. Commercial kitchens carrying grease or oil contamination risk should be tested every six months. Dry corridors and general walkways can typically be maintained on a two-year cycle supplemented by quarterly visual inspection. Staircases should be audited annually, with additional inspections following any incident. Car parks and external areas should be audited annually and following any sealing or resurfacing. Any surface treatment — cleaning product change, coating application, mechanical maintenance — should trigger a targeted retest of the affected zones before they return to normal service.
A WHS inspector who identifies non-compliant floor surfaces can issue an improvement notice requiring remediation within a specified timeframe, typically 8–30 days. If the risk is assessed as immediate and serious, a prohibition notice may be issued, requiring the zone to be shut down until compliance is achieved. Inspectors from SafeWork NSW have the authority to take photographic evidence, collect surface samples, and request your test certificate history. Failure to produce documentation of prior testing or a remediation plan can escalate the matter to an enforceable undertaking or prosecution. Financial penalties for serious WHS breaches can reach $150,000 for an individual and $1.5 million for a corporation. Beyond penalties, a documented non-compliance finding strengthens any civil claim arising from a subsequent slip injury.
Generally no. While P3 is the minimum standard for general dry interior areas under AS4586, aged care facilities are subject to the Aged Care Quality Standards (Standard 8) and ACQSC guidance that requires providers to manage environmental risks for a high-risk population. Falls are the leading cause of injury in residential aged care, and regulatory guidance from both ACQSC and SafeWork recommends P4 as a minimum across all pedestrian areas in aged care, including dry corridors. Wet areas in aged care require P4–P5 — the same as any commercial facility. If your aged care facility has any zones at P3 in an area where residents walk, you should obtain a formal risk assessment and consider treatment. A P3 result in a dry corridor of a general office building is compliant. The same result in an aged care corridor presents a documented liability.
P-ratings (P0–P5) are derived from the wet pendulum test under AS4586/AS4663 and express slip resistance in terms of Pendulum Test Value (PTV) measured in British Pendulum Number (BPN). They are applied to pedestrian surfaces tested in a laboratory or on-site. R-ratings (R9–R13) are derived from a ramp angle test where a test person walks on the surface coated in oil at increasing angles until they can no longer maintain their footing. R-ratings are typically applied to industrial and external surfaces. R10 is the general minimum for pedestrian areas in car parks and external circulation zones. The two systems measure different physical phenomena using different methods — a P4 surface and an R10 surface cannot be directly compared.
No — but you need to test every high-risk zone and every zone type. The approach is risk-based, not room-by-room. A large office building might have 60 individual rooms but only 8 distinct surface types in distinct risk categories: external entry, lobby, lift lobby, wet amenities, kitchen, staircase, general corridor, and car park. A representative number of test points in each zone type, selected at the highest-traffic and highest-wear locations, satisfies AS4663 methodology. Where a zone is large, multiple test points should be distributed to capture wear variation. The test report must document which zones were tested, the test point locations, and the basis for the sampling strategy.
For non-slip chemical coatings — the most common remediation method for compliant tile surfaces — the application itself takes 2–4 hours per 50m², with a cure period of 24–48 hours before the zone can return to full service. The NATA-accredited tester can typically conduct the post-treatment AS4663 retest on the second day after treatment, and the certificate is usually issued within 24 hours of the test. In practice, most wet-area remediations using chemical coating are complete — application, cure, retest, certificate — within 72 hours. Mechanical grinding and shot blasting typically require 3–5 days per zone. Full tile replacement is 7–14 days depending on zone size. During remediation, the zone must remain cordoned off with appropriate WHS signage.
We reply within 24 hours.
Do you need immediate assistance?
Give us a call at 1300 987 095
!